Teach major religions, make more informed citizens

March 24, 2011 in Spotlight Answers, When teaching public school students about religion, what is appropriate and what is not? by Yasir Qadhi

Should the Bible be taught in our public schools? Should our schools also teach students about the Quran, the Book of Mormon, the Vedas and other sacred texts? When it comes to teaching public school students about religion, what is appropriate and what is not?

In our eagerness to separate Church and State, at times, some seem to go too far. There are those who would like to ban the teaching of religion at public schools. Some of them are well-intentioned: what if a teacher becomes a preacher in the classroom, and substitutes the podium for the pulpit? Not too many parents would be happy with that!

Another argument is that, if multiple faiths are taught, this might possibly appear to preference some religions over others (there is no question that not all faiths can be taught simultaneously). “How would a person of a minority faith feel when her own tradition is completely sidelined for the ‘major’ ones?” they reason.

On the other side of this spectrum, there are those who wish to ban religion from public schools because of their own hostility and aversion to religion in general. Many people view religion (and the existence of God) as myths that lack scientific evidence, and therefore feel insulted that their children must be exposed to such ‘fables’.

There is no question that some of these concerns are very real. Nonetheless, I believe that the need for teaching religion, and the benefits accrued through such a study, far outweighs any potential harm. Additionally, with some foresight and care, most of the potential pitfalls of teaching religion in public schools can be avoided. I would advocate the teaching of religion in public schools with two basic conditions: First, that multiple faith traditions be taught, and second, that the philosophy behind such an education is to create awareness and tolerance, and not to convert a child to a particular faith.

Whether one is religious or not, it is an undeniable fact that religion plays a very important role in the world today. Religious tendencies tend to shape social mores, political movements, and even economic change. Religious zeal is a power that leads many to do good, and others to inflict harm. Religion is an integral part of the world’s history, and even the founding of our own country is rooted in religious causes. For all of these reasons, our children need to be taught religion, just as they need to be taught history and political science. It is impossible to be well-educated in today’s world while being ignorant of religion. And by exposing our children to multiple faith traditions, we can help increase understanding and spread tolerance (traits that are very much needed in today’s world). As any reader of the religious traditions will tell you, a study of religions helps one appreciate the commonality of all faiths while realizing the uniqueness of one’s own.

In order to safeguard against abuse of religious teachings in school, guidelines can be developed to ensure that teachers teach, and not proselytize. Textbooks can be assigned that would reflect neutrality and impartiality. Other faith traditions that are not taught in detail can be mentioned, or assigned as class projects. If a parent feels strongly about not exposing his or her child to religious studies, while on a personal level I would try to talk the parent out of such an unhelpful attitude, I do believe that this is the parent’s right.

I am a Muslim, and, like all religious parents, I am eager to pass my faith down to my children. Yet, I also desire that my children study other faiths and appreciate the diversity of the world. Such an exposure will make them more informed citizens and more compassionate humans.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditlinkedinmail

Scriptures not best way to study religion

March 23, 2011 in Question of the Week, Spotlight Answers, When teaching public school students about religion, what is appropriate and what is not? by Mark Muesse

Should the Bible be taught in our public schools? Should our schools also teach students about the Quran, the Book of Mormon, the Vedas and other sacred texts? When it comes to teaching public school students about religion, what is appropriate and what is not?
I am of two minds about teaching sacred texts in public schools.  One the one hand, I am absolutely convinced that students need to be exposed to humanity’s great literature and repositories of wisdom to take their places as educated citizens of the world.  Sacred books like the Bible, the Qur’an, the Vedas, and the Dhammapada are vital parts of our human heritage.  To exclude them from our schools simply because they are the scriptures of particular religious traditions deprives students of some of our most precious resources.  These texts have profoundly shaped the lives of billions of human beings.  Whether or not we ourselves consider these books to be sacred is irrelevant.  Their impact on human existence is profound and undeniable, and they ought to be studied for that reason alone.

On the other hand, I am deeply concerned about how these books would be taught in public schools by teachers who have little to no training in the study of the world’s religions.  Numerous studies indicate that the American educational system is only mediocre when it comes to teaching math, science, and reading—subjects in which our public school teachers are ostensibly well trained.  I am not optimistic when I think of how these very difficult texts will be taught by those who know little about them.  Reading and interpreting the Bible, the Qur’an, or the Vedas is not easy.  Studying these books is not like studying Mark Twain or even Shakespeare.  To understand scripture academically requires a solid grounding in the history of the cultures that produced them and a firm grasp of the communities that continue to revere them.

But even having a good background in history is not sufficient for teaching sacred texts.  An instructor also needs to be theologically and ethically astute.  There is much in the scriptures of the world’s religions that requires the operation of a critical mind.  Take for example the story of Noah.  Although that tale is routinely told to children—who are of course enthralled by the animals on the ark—the story is (or should be) shocking to people with moral sensitivities.  It portrays the god Jehovah as an impetuous deity who decides to slaughter everyone except Noah’s family because he is upset with their behavior.  I find that depiction of god morally offensive and would not want my daughter exposed to it unless it was made clear that this image is an idea about god that we are not obliged to accept.  How do you explain to children a god who does not feel compelled to follow his own commandment not to murder?  To be able to make sense of the story of Noah requires some serious intellectual acumen.

There are a lot of stories in the Bible like this, and many of them are so familiar that we fail to recognize how troubling and vexing they can be.  And it’s not only the Bible that has moral and theological problems.  The Qur’an has its difficult verses, which, when taken out of context, present similar problems.  Unless an instructor is familiar with Islamic principles of interpretation, particularly the rule of abrogation, one might easily think that Muslims believe something that is really not the case.

Better than teaching sacred texts, I think, is offering courses in world religions.  It is much simpler to teach about the beliefs and practices of religious persons than it is to study their sacred books.  In fact, for learning about the religions of the world, it is much more important to study beliefs and practices rather than sacred texts.  To some degree, beliefs and practices can be derived by reading scriptures, but not usually.  The central Christian doctrine of the Trinity, for example, is not at all mentioned in the Bible.  The study of a tradition’s scripture, in my view, should come well after a student has a solid understanding of a religion’s basic beliefs and practices.  Scriptures simply do not provide the best entrée into understanding a religion.

Competently teaching about the world’s religions in public schools is highly desirable; but teaching sacred texts is not the best way to do that.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditlinkedinmail