Celebration as closure

May 5, 2011 in Osama bin Laden’s death, Question of the Week, Spotlight Answers by Noel Hutchinson

As a native New Yorker, I have for almost the past 30 years driven over the world famous Brooklyn Bridge, looking at the skyline of lower Manhattan before turning onto the FDR Drive. This trip, begun in earlier years out of necessity, has now become a ritual every time I have the opportunity to visit.

I still remember the first time I took this route, looking up and seeing the World Trade Center. As a dyed in the wool urbanite, this very location—on the bridge looking up—has given me great peace across the years. It was the intersection of God-given knowledge being applied through the old—the bridge—and the fairly new skyscraper constructed when I was a child. As I write this, I remember the Twin Towers with the two floors of shopping, the subway, a PATH station taking commuters to New Jersey, and the constant press of multicolored humanity that moved below, around, through, and in these buildings.

And then September 11, 2001 changed my favorite view, the New York skyline, and the collective psyche of New Yorkers and all Americans. I called the Bronx to check on childhood friends, and accidentally dialed the number of a firehouse in my old neighborhood. The fireman on the other end of the line told me that the smell of Ground Zero had made its way to the firehouse, about 20 miles away. Last Sunday, about 10:30 p.m. our time, celebration of the death of Osama bin Laden rang across this country. Since then, there have been many who have said that to celebrate the death of a man, albeit a wicked one, goes against the principles of people of faith. Others have rightly said that the terrorist threat still remains—and look for its increase as a result of this action.

To me, the celebration for many isn’t blood thirst, but psychological closure. Until last Sunday, many Americans were like the victims of violent crimes, who, not receiving counseling, were left to battle their pain and suffering alone. Since 9/11, America fought, and still fights, in two wars, with the potential of a third. Bloodshed of our troops becomes more common. A country unaccustomed to defeat and abuse until Sunday was incomplete. Much more importantly, those who directly suffered as a result of these attacks—forgotten by the country—needed closure.

As people of faith, we know that life introduces us to suffering caused by the wicked. We must remind others and ourselves that wickedness did not cease on the earth due to the demise of bin Laden, just as it continued after the death of Adolph Hitler. As we live our faith, it is incumbent upon us to be a living epistle of how to live through our pain, of how to be wounded healers, and how to live as the righteous so that evil will be made to retreat. Light repels darkness, and whether it be the misguided burners of Korans, the birthers who major in the nonexistent, racists with a divisive agenda, or those who live in Christian religion rather than a relationship with Jesus Christ, we who know better must continue to be bright lights of the Lord’s love.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditlinkedinmail

Avoid revenge and resentment

May 5, 2011 in Osama bin Laden’s death, Question of the Week, Spotlight Answers by Val Handwerker

As people of faith, we ought to have gratitude that further atrocities against persons will not be carried out through Osama bin Laden.  Also, we should share solidarity with those who are loved ones of people murdered in attacks directed by bin Laden.  These days may well be extremely difficult for them.  Finally, as people of faith—especially those of us who have recently focused on the death and resurrection of Jesus—we must avoid at all costs sentiments of revenge and resentment.  Jesus, as he faced a violent death, has given a witness free of any resentment and revenge.  Even though others may have shown no reverence for the dignity of human life, their disregard for life’s dignity does not give us permission to reciprocate in kind.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditlinkedinmail

Having mixed feelings is acceptable

May 5, 2011 in Osama bin Laden’s death, Question of the Week, Spotlight Answers by Chris Altrock

How should Christians respond to the death of someone like Osama bin Laden?

Upon news from President Obama that Osama bin Laden had been killed by American forces, people responded with more 4,000 tweets per second speed, making this one of Twitter’s busiest usage periods in history. Many of these tweets and accompanying messages on other social networks quoted Scripture. Stephen Smith, who analyzes data on Scriptures quoted online, compiled a list of the most popular verses quoted in the twelve hours after bin Laden’s death. Here are the top ten:

Proverbs 24:17: “Do not gloat when your enemy falls; when they stumble, do not let your heart rejoice.”
Psalm 138:8: “The LORD will make PERFECT the things that concern me”(KJV). (NIV: “The LORD will vindicate me; your love, LORD, endures forever—do not abandon the works of your hands.”)
Proverbs 21:15: “When justice is done, it brings joy to the righteous but terror to evildoers.”
Ezekiel 33:11: “Say to them, ‘As surely as I live, declares the Sovereign LORD, I take no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but rather that they turn from their ways and live. Turn! Turn from your evil ways! Why will you die, people of Israel?”
Ezekiel 18:23: “Do I take any pleasure in the death of the wicked? declares the Sovereign LORD. Rather, am I not pleased when they turn from their ways and live?”
Isaiah 1:18: “Come now, let us settle the matter,” says the LORD. “Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red as crimson, they shall be like wool.”
Proverbs 11:10: “When the righteous prosper, the city rejoices; when the wicked perish, there are shouts of joy.”
Proverbs 24:18: ” … or the LORD will see and disapprove and turn his wrath away from them.”
Proverbs 24:1: “Do not envy the wicked, do not desire their company;”
Proverbs 28:5: Evildoers do not understand what is right, but those who seek the LORD understand it fully.”

It’s not hard to see the tension which Christians felt in the hours after bin Laden’s death. One the one hand some Christians quoted “when justice is done it brings joy to the righteous” and “when the wicked perish there are shouts of joy”. On the other hand, some quoted “Do not gloat when your enemy falls” and “I take no pleasure in the death of the wicked.” On Monday morning the staff I serve with gathered to pray about bin Laden’s death and we struggled to know what to say. In our hearts, we felt the tension expressed in these contrasting Scriptures.

Which “side” is right—taking joy or taking no joy? John Piper, a popular author and preacher, argues that both are right. Writing in the aftermath of bin Laden’s death, Piper suggested that, “God approves and disapproves the death of Osama bin Laden… My suggestion is that the death and misery of the unrepentant is in and of itself not a pleasure to God…The death and suffering considered for itself alone is not his delight. Rather, when a rebellious, wicked, unbelieving person is judged, what God has pleasure in is the exaltation of truth and righteousness, and the vindication of his own honor and glory.”

There is thus a strange mixture of righteous joy and somber humility upon the death of someone like bin Laden.

New Testament scholar Timothy Dalrymple urged readers to consider the wrong things and the right things to celebrate:
“1. FIRST, Christians do not celebrate the loss of a soul. Osama bin Laden did not enter the world as a terrorist. He entered as a child of God…The story of the loss of his soul is tragic…

2. SECOND, I don’t think that Christians should celebrate Osama bin Laden’s death in itself…It is tragic that such a thing, in this case, was necessary…What, then, might be rightly celebrated about 5/2? 1. I think it is perfectly permissible to celebrate that justice was finally done…2. I also think it’s perfectly permissible to celebrate the consequences of Osama bin Laden’s death. The world was made safer… 3. Finally, I think it’s possible to celebrate that America has accomplished something difficult and complicated…”
Once again, there is this unlikely mixture of celebration and solemnity.

That is where I find myself, now days removed from the event. I am filled with remorse at the violence bin Laden caused and inspired others to cause. I am filled with soberness as I consider the many lives lost in pursuit of bin Laden and the way bin Laden lost himself and his own soul due to his wicked choices. But I am also filled with relief and gratitude that indeed, justice was done. I am thankful for those who gave or risked their lives to make our world safer. And I celebrate a God who is passionate about righteousness and justice.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditlinkedinmail

Building interfaith cooperation is best response

May 5, 2011 in Osama bin Laden’s death, Question of the Week, Spotlight Answers by Burton Carley

How should people of faith respond to Osama bin Laden’s death?

A CNN poll discovered that 61 percent of the respondents thought Osama bin Laden was in hell.  Why CNN believed this was a useful piece of information to gather is beyond my imagination.  Politics is befuddled enough without adding a murky layer of metaphysics.  What matters is the hell created on earth, and how we respond to the inhumanity of those who feel justified in using terror as a weapon for an ideological end, or simply for maintaining power over others.

It is a somber thing to take the life of another even in the name of justice.  This is because life is precious and it makes a difference how one defends life.  There is always the temptation to become like the enemy.  Hate and vengeance do not operate within a moral imperative.  Triumphal dancing in the streets may be a spontaneous expression of relief on the news of bin Laden’s death yet humiliating our enemy does not serve justice.

In the defense of humanity bin Laden was hunted.  He helped to plan and inspire the death of thousands, including Muslims.  He hijacked not only the planes that caused the tragedy of 9/11/2001 but also the Islamic faith to justify his terrorism.  The demise of any tyrant gives hope for the pursuit of peace.  The best response to bin Laden’s death is a renewed effort to build and sustain interfaith tolerance and cooperation.

Even as we defend the human spirit against every power that would diminish it let us not forget that the line dividing good and evil runs through every heart.  And humility is always the better part of valor.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditlinkedinmail

Just war and peace

May 4, 2011 in Featured Question of the Week, Osama bin Laden’s death by Steve Montgomery

How should people of faith respond to Osama bin Laden’s death?

There is a natural tendency for many of us to be relieved at the death of Osama bin Laden. We marvel at the daring and courage of the special operations unit that killed him. I know I can’t help but feel compassion for those who lost lives in the 9/11 tragedy.  Many feel avenged.  Many feel pride, and when I am most honest with myself, those are feelings within my heart.

But our faith is not based upon feelings.  It is based upon our trust in the one who came riding into the city and wept because the the people did not know the things that make for peace; trust in the one who said “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called children of God;”  trust in the one whom we hail as the “prince of peace.” Our faith is based upon trust, not feelings.

For two centuries Christians have strugged  to live under the standard of Jesus’ Gospel of peace.  In fact, for the first 300 years the dominant Christian teaching was pacifism.  Beginning with St. Augustine in the 5th century, another witness–the “just war” tradition–evolved.  Most Christian communities of faith adhere to this tradition. However, it begins with a strong presumption against killing.  And when killing does take place, it must never be glorified or praised.  It must be met with repentance, because it falls short of what God desires.

Will this make the world safer? Though this might be good for the morale and psychology of a nation, this is a question that remains to be answered, but the evidence is not good.   Has the trillions of dollars spent since 9/11 and the thousands of American lives, not to mention the thousands of innocent civilians killed in Iraq and Afghanistan made us safer?  True, there have not been similar attacks upon our country, but globally I believe that our war on terror has birthed more terrorists than it has killed. Our standing in much of the world has become more a source of resentment than of inspiration.

Let me close with two comments from generals that are worth considering. The first was from Gen. Omar Bradley following World War II:  “We have grasped the mystery of the atom and rejected the Sermon on the Mount.  The world has achieved brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear and ethical midgets. We know more aobut war than we do about peace, more about killing than we know about living.”

Finally, yesterday I heard Gen. Colin Powell respond to a question about why we should bother to give Osama bin Laden a burial “in accord with Muslim law.”  Why do this to someone who was so evil, so vile, he asked the general.  “Because that’s who we are,” General Powell responded.

As I think about my response to bin Laden’s death, I am forced to ask the question “Who am I?”  Though there is a part of me that wanted revenge and is relieved, that does not make it right.  For my faith is based not on feelings, but on trust in the one who said  “I have come that you might have life, and have it abundantly;”  the one who said “I have come that you might know peace.”

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditlinkedinmail

Just War lesson forgotten in the midst of cheers

May 4, 2011 in Featured Question of the Week, Osama bin Laden’s death by Peter Gathje

The radical call of Jesus to love our enemies is routinely neglected and even contemptuously dismissed by so many of us who call ourselves Christians.  The cheers that have arisen in response to the killing of Osama bin Laden reveal the moral and spiritual vacuity of a people whose real faith is in weapons and nationalistic power rather than in Jesus Christ.

Not only has Jesus’ gospel of peacemaking through the cross rather than the sword been cast aside, so too has the compromised position of the Christian tradition of Just War.  For even in the Christian tradition of Just War there is to be no celebration of an enemy’s death and defeat.  Instead, within Just War Christians are called to the sober realization that in a sinful world we have once again resorted to killing because in our own sinfulness and the sinfulness of the world we could find no other alternative.

This recognition of how we are all implicated in the sinful mess of this world, that we are all sinners, that “none are righteous no not one” should turn us away from the temptation to celebrate and toward the truth that no killing ends killing, no war ends war, that those who live by the sword die by the sword.  Osama bin Laden’s death continues the sorrowful cycle of violence; a cycle in which he fully participated, and a cycle in which our nation fully participates.  Jesus calls us to break this cycle and a first step is to remember that all violence requires repentance.

The Vatican, in its statement about the death of bin Laden, reflects the moral and spiritual seriousness Christians ought to have who are trying to respond to Christ’s call to love of enemy in a violent world:  “Osama bin Laden, as we all know, bore the most serious responsibility for spreading divisions and hatred among populations, causing the deaths of innumerable people, and manipulating religions for this purpose.  In the face of a man’s death, a Christian never rejoices, but reflects on the serious responsibilities of each person before God and before men, and hopes and works so that every event may be the occasion for the further growth of peace and not of hatred.”

Here in this Vatican statement is an honest description of the evils perpetrated by bin Laden and the truthful recognition that his death should remind each of us that we are all under God’s judgment.

St. Paul wrote that disciples of Jesus should not be overcome by evil but should overcome evil with good.  We have been overcome by evil when we share in the murderous desires of someone like bin Laden, and we share in those murderous desires when we celebrate his death.  We overcome evil with good by recognizing evil and resisting evil in ways that do not imitate the evil we are resisting.  This is the way of Jesus.

 

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditlinkedinmail

A tragic life, a tragic death

May 4, 2011 in Osama bin Laden’s death, Question of the Week, Spotlight Answers by Randolph Meade Walker

How should people of faith respond to Osama bin Laden’s death?

As a Christian clergyman I simply cannot rejoice at anyone’s death who I believe lacks knowledge of Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. While Osama Bin Laden has his hands stained with blood and perished the way he chose to live, his is, nevertheless, a tragic life. He chose to kill and destroy rather than heal and live peaceful. It is unfortunate that he did not know and therefore forfeited a more excellent way to make whatever point he was trying to make in life.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditlinkedinmail

Little comfort and less joy

May 3, 2011 in Osama bin Laden’s death, Question of the Week, Spotlight Answers by Harry K. Danziger

How should people of faith respond to Osama bin Laden’s death?

It is human to feel joy at bin Laden’s death. He embodied the evil that left so much devastation and grief in our country. But that joy is limited. His death was just one of thousands he caused, planned or inspired, and the grief he left behind overwhelms any pleasure at his death.

I remember that, for many of us, the hanging of Adolf Eichman, architect of the Holocaust, ultimately brought little comfort much less joy. It could not compare with the horrors he caused. Eichman and bin Laden celebrated death; our best response is to celebrate life.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditlinkedinmail

Thoughts on the death of bin Laden

May 3, 2011 in Featured Question of the Week, Osama bin Laden’s death, Question of the Week by Yasir Qadhi

Osama bin Laden is dead.

Some have responded by cheering his death, jumping for jingoistic joy as they thump their chests screaming, ‘USA! USA!’. On the other side of the spectrum, radical websites have mourned his death as the loss of a ‘martyr’.

I’m afraid I cannot sympathize with either of these two extremes. The fact of the matter is, contrary to what both bin Laden and his one-time nemesis Bush propagated, we don’t live in a stark black-and-white world. We live in a very colorful, very multi-faceted world. Because I refuse to see everything in black-and-white, my position is neither one of sorrow nor one of elation.

It is not one of sorrow because I never viewed bin Laden as someone representing the teachings of my faith. He was a reactionary who lacked wisdom and who had no long-term vision. His response to the political grievances that he felt was a visceral rage expressed in the language of a false, pseudo-jihad – an understanding of ‘jihad’ that he himself invented, and not one that the trained scholars of Islam shared with him. He helped formulate and propagate ideas that caused more bloodshed in Muslim lands, and more civil war, than any Western invasion in the last decade. Suicide bombers claiming allegiance to him cheerfully bombed men, women and children in bazaars in Baghdad, in shrines in Karachi, in skyscrapers in New York, and in markets in Kabul.

Bin Laden was already largely irrelevant in the Arab and Muslim world anyway. What good did all of his fiery rhetoric ever do for the Palestinians he claimed to have been fighting for? And what impact did he have amongst the Arab masses as they all rallied together (and continue to do so) against their brutal dictators? From the alleyways of Benghazi to the maydans of Cairo, and from the mosques of Damascus to the streets of Sana’a, not one protester waved the flag of Osama or chanted slogans of al-Qaeda. It was the people who brought about real change, not Osama with his anti-American rage and calls for violence.

Yet, I cannot cheer his death either. Why?

Firstly, because the intentional taking of another human life is not a cause for cheering. Yes, sometimes life needs to be taken (as in the case of a State executing a murderer), but it is not appropriate to rejoice at this act.

Secondly, those who looked up to bin Laden for inspiration were not motivated to become suicide bombers and radical terrorists because bin Laden managed to brainwash them. The grievances that all such radicals recite are political and social. Bin Laden was but a figurehead, and his death will actually feed into the whole martyrdom mythology that these movements weave around themselves. As Jeremy F. Walton, professor of Religious Studies at NYU, wrote on his blog today,

“I do not mean to denigrate the persistent grief of the families of 9/11 victims, or, for that matter, the pain that countless Americans continue to experience when they recall or witness the indelible images of that infamous Tuesday morning. But make no mistake: last night’s celebrators, and all those whom they represent, have no comprehension of the political history, quotidian violence, and post-colonial frustration over increasing global inequities—to gesture to but a few factors—that made Osama bin Laden and his network possible. Political theorist Mahmood Mamdani, for one, has vigorously argued that a reckoning of the American role in the creation of jihadist violence during the Cold War is indispensable to understanding al-Qaeda itself. Acknowledgement of this neglected political history is even more crucial in the wake of bin Laden’s death.”

Therefore, the real question for me is not whether we should rejoice or not. The real questions are far more profound and difficult to answer.

Now that we have killed bin Laden, will his death extinguish his ideas and truly make the world a safer place?

Now that we have killed bin Laden, will the anger that millions of people around the world feel towards our foreign policy simply dissipate into thin air?

Now that we have killed bin Laden, will that justify the trillions of dollars that we have spent on our two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the hundreds of thousands of dead since 9/11?

Now that we have killed bin Laden, will our infamous ‘War on Terror’ finally come to an end, and will we discontinue drone attacks in far-away lands and draconian policies back home? (And on that note: can we finally travel with our toothpaste and without having to be sexually assaulted by TSA officials?!)

Now that we have killed bin Laden, will the hysteria being propagated by the Right and the Islamophobia that is rampant across Europe and America subside?

Now that we have killed bin Laden, will we start concentrating on far more important domestic and international issues?

I guess the bottom line is: now that we have killed bin Laden, has status quo really changed all that much?

I don’t have answers to all of these questions, but these are the questions that need to be asked before we rush to celebrate his death.

It took America – the most powerful and technologically advanced country on earth – a full ten years to find this one man. How great it would have been if we had managed to capture the perpetrators of 9/11 ten years ago! But our own reactions to 9/11 created a whole list of new issues, both domestic and international, that the killing of bin Laden will not solve. And to make matters even worse, in that decade a new generation, a young generation, has come of age – a generation for whom 9/11 evokes barely a memory. For this young generation, the death of bin Laden does little to solve its own problems.

If we have learned anything from the Arab protesters across the Middle East, it is that change has to begin from within, and the best way to fight for the change that you believe in –  even if that fight be against powerful regimes – is through nonviolent means.  Killing your enemies doesn’t solve problems; working proactively and productively to gain the world’s sympathy when clear injustices have been committed does.

The death of bin Laden should mark a new beginning – I hope that it actually does.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditlinkedinmail

Time for deep introspection

May 3, 2011 in Osama bin Laden’s death, Question of the Week, Spotlight Answers by Rachel Shankman

How should people of faith respond to Osama bin Laden’s death?

I can clearly recall where I was as the devastating news of September 11 unfolded and the anguish it brought to so many families. If the death of Osama bin Laden brings them comfort then I am grateful for the easing of their pain. I must admit to not feeling the unbridled euphoria that I am witnessing on T.V. and in the news, perhaps because I feel now is a time to be reflective, not only about this one individual who wreaked such havoc but about the ideology that fueled his hatred. My fear is that the ideology that spawned acts of terrorism did not die with bin Laden and that the work ahead for all of us to combat ignorance, bigotry and hatred. Now is not the time for jockeying for credit, for conspiracy theories, but for deep introspection and gratitude for what binds us as human beings.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditlinkedinmail